[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151002124903.GA11987@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 05:49:03 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI: Fix hard lockup in scsi_remove_target()
> - list_for_each_entry(starget, &shost->__targets, siblings) {
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(starget, tmp, &shost->__targets, siblings) {
> if (starget->state == STARGET_DEL)
> continue;
> if (starget->dev.parent == dev || &starget->dev == dev) {
> /* assuming new targets arrive at the end */
Now that the last variable is gone this comments isn't needed.
> kref_get(&starget->reap_ref);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
> - if (last)
> - scsi_target_reap(last);
> - last = starget;
> +
> __scsi_remove_target(starget);
> + list_move_tail(&starget->siblings, &reap_list);
> spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
> }
What makes the list_move save after dropping host_lock? I think this
needs to be changed to not drop the host_lock and change
__scsi_remove_target to expect host_lock held to be safe.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists