| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:47:58 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [lkp] [PATCH v4 3/5] mfd: tps65912: Add driver for the TPS65912
PMIC
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 09:32:12PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 10:58:59AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > It would be good if somewhere early on in these mails the report said if
> > the build failed - that's key information about how urgent issues are
> > and it's not always clear if things are errors or warnings.
> When the robot say "All error/warnings" it has build failure (and
> possibly warnings). If there are only build warnings it'll say
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
Ah, I see - it's more clear in the warnings only case, it's less obvious
in the errors case that this message would be different if there were
only warnings.
> Would you like making that line more clear, or show the info
> earlier in the email body or even email title? For example,
> the first line could be changed to
> [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc3 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore]
> [auto build test WARNING on v4.3-rc3 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore]
> depending on whether it has build failure or just warnings.
That would be excellent, yes.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists