[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1510022328560.2163@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 23:33:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: misc: remove "complex return code"
warnings
Do you consider that this function would be better off in two lines?
static int mxt_acquire_irq(struct mxt_data *data)
{
int error;
enable_irq(data->irq);
error = mxt_process_messages_until_invalid(data);
if (error)
return error;
return 0;
}
Would simplifying the code at the end of the following function be helpful
or not?
static int adnp_gpio_setup(struct adnp *adnp, unsigned int num_gpios)
{
struct gpio_chip *chip = &adnp->gpio;
int err;
adnp->reg_shift = get_count_order(num_gpios) - 3;
chip->direction_input = adnp_gpio_direction_input;
chip->direction_output = adnp_gpio_direction_output;
chip->get = adnp_gpio_get;
chip->set = adnp_gpio_set;
chip->can_sleep = true;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS))
chip->dbg_show = adnp_gpio_dbg_show;
chip->base = -1;
chip->ngpio = num_gpios;
chip->label = adnp->client->name;
chip->dev = &adnp->client->dev;
chip->of_node = chip->dev->of_node;
chip->owner = THIS_MODULE;
err = gpiochip_add(chip);
if (err)
return err;
return 0;
}
thanks,
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists