[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BY2PR0301MB16548C72EA442B3BF36C9230A04B0@BY2PR0301MB1654.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 21:43:15 +0000
From: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86: guest: rely on leaf 0x40000001 to detect Hyper-V
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@...utronix.de]
> Sent: Friday, October 2, 2015 1:07 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>; x86@...nel.org;
> devel@...uxdriverproject.org; alex.williamson@...hat.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86: guest: rely on leaf 0x40000001 to detect Hyper-V
>
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > Change ms_hyperv_platform to actually do what the specification
> suggests.
> > > This roughy matches what Windows looks for, though Windows actually
> > > ignores HYPERV_CPUID_VENDOR_AND_MAX_FUNCTIONS completely.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> >
> > Thanks Paolo.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
>
> Does that mean Acked-by or Reviewed-by? SOB certainly does not apply
> here.
Thomas,
I have reviewed the patch and am acking this change.
Regards,
K. Y
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists