[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151002220051.GA26712@gate.crashing.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 17:00:51 -0500
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>
Cc: Peter Bergner <bergner@...t.ibm.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Missing operand for tlbie instruction on Power7
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 12:37:35AM +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> >> -0: tlbie r4; \
> >> +0: tlbie r4, 0; \
> >
> > This isn't correct. With POWER7 and later (which this compile
> > is, since it's on LE), the tlbie instruction takes two register
> > operands:
> >
> > tlbie RB, RS
> >
> > The tlbie instruction on pre POWER7 cpus had one required register
> > operand (RB) and an optional second L operand, where if you omitted
> > it, it was the same as using "0":
> >
> > tlbie RB, L
> >
> > This is a POWER7 and later build, so your change which adds the "0"
> > above is really adding r0 for RS. The new tlbie instruction doesn't
> > treat r0 specially, so you'll be using whatever random bits which
> > happen to be in r0 which I don't think that is what you want.
>
> Ok, than we can just zero out r5 for example and use it in tlbie as RS,
> right?
That won't assemble _unless_ your assembler is in POWER7 mode. It also
won't do the right thing at run time on older machines.
Where is this tlbia macro used at all, for 64-bit machines?
Segher
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists