linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lustre: llite: Added a blank line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <EBCBEFD4-5FD8-449C-81DB-84F27D52C198@intel.com>
Date:	Sat, 3 Oct 2015 15:53:22 +0000
From:	"Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
To:	Anjali Menon <cse.anjalimenon@...il.com>
CC:	"<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"<HPDD-discuss@...ts.01.org>" <HPDD-discuss@...ts.01.org>,
	"<devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	"<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lustre: llite: Added a blank line


On Oct 3, 2015, at 7:39 AM, Anjali Menon wrote:

> Added a blank line after declaration to fix the coding
> style warning detected by checkpatch.pl
> 
> WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anjali Menon <cse.anjalimenon@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c
> index aec9a44..a626871 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c
> @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ static void sort_add_capa(struct obd_capa *ocapa, struct list_head *head)
> static inline int obd_capa_open_count(struct obd_capa *oc)

This whole file has been recently removed.
In general at least with Lustre (and probably with other staging code) it's best to
base your work on Greg's staging-next (or even staging-testing) tree because this
is where the most up to date code is (And this is where Greg tries to apply it anyway).

> {
> 	struct ll_inode_info *lli = ll_i2info(oc->u.cli.inode);
> +
> 	return atomic_read(&lli->lli_open_count);
> }
> 
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/