[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87twq7ans7.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 18:02:16 +0100
From: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com>
To: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Olivier Mauras <olivier@...ras.ch>,
PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] unix: fix use-after-free in unix_dgram_poll()
Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com> writes:
> On 2 October 2015 at 22:43, Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com> wrote:
>> The unix_dgram_poll() routine calls sock_poll_wait() not only for the wait
>> queue associated with the socket s that we are poll'ing against, but also calls
[useless full-quote removed]
> My reproducer runs on this patch for more than 3 days now without
> triggering anything anymore.
Since the behaviour of your program is random, using it to "test"
anything doesn't really provide any insight: It could have been
executing the same codepath which doesn't happen to trigger any problems
for all of these three days. Nobody can tell.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists