[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1510032137390.4500@nanos>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 21:40:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes
On Sat, 3 Oct 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Please pull the latest x86-urgent-for-linus git tree from:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86-urgent-for-linus
> >
> > # HEAD: f4b4aae1828855db761bf998ce37d3062b1d6446 x86/headers/uapi: Fix __BITS_PER_LONG value for x32 builds
> >
> > Fixes all around the map: W+X kernel mapping fix, WCHAN fixes, two build failure
> > fixes for corner case configs, x32 header fix and a speling fix.
>
> Sorry, please don't pull this tree: Thomas tells me that the two WCHAN fixes
> trigger some sort of badness in Sasha's testing:
>
> > Thomas Gleixner (2):
> > x86/process: Add proper bound checks in 64bit get_wchan()
> > x86/process: Unify 32bit and 64bit implementations of get_wchan()
>
> I don't know any details yet.
Andrey Ryabinin explained it here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=144387188203639&w=2
So it's a false positive and the patches are good to go.
I rechecked as well another five times that the bound check is
correct.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists