[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <561049F1.5040507@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 22:34:41 +0100
From: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: hiddev: fix returned errno code in hiddev_connect()
On 30/09/15 20:40, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
>
>> The driver is using -1 instead of the -ENOMEM defined macro to specify
>> that a buffer allocation failed. Since the error number is propagated,
>> the caller will get a -EPERM which is the wrong error condition.
>
> Generally I agree that the more specific errno, the better.
>
> But I am not really sure where you are seeing the bug (mapping to -EPERM)
> in this case? I think the only caller of hiddev_connect() should be
> hid_connect(), and the only thing that guy cares about whether individual
> callbacks succeed or fail, so that it sets hdev->clamed flags accordingly.
>
> Could you please be more specific about the -EPERM mapping you are talking
> about?
>
> Thanks,
>
I agree with you. The only caller of hiddev_connect() only checks if the
callback succeded. It checks if the return < 0.
What I meant is that -1 means -EPERM. [0]
This patch is purely about the correctness of using -ENOMEM. The word
"propagated" was not the best way to describe this problem. I could edit
the commit message if you would like.
Thanks for the review,
Luis
[0] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/uapi/asm-generic/errno-base.h#L15
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists