linux-kernel - Re: blk_mq_register_disk: kobject (00000000009f2dd8): tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACVXFVPBL60U-m37R-r_P2=fFHM7cTGOLJ+5MB5Pgwh1Xudy0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 4 Oct 2015 07:27:31 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To:	Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>
Cc:	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: blk_mq_register_disk: kobject (00000000009f2dd8): tried to init
 an initialized object, something is seriously wrong.

On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee> wrote:
>> This is 4.3.0-rc1 on Sun E220R (dual-CPU sparc64). Sometimes it boots,
>> sometimes it fails to boot with looping errors and finally a watchdog
>> timeout. This console log from a failure. Config is below.
>
> I noticed blk-mq related changes in todays git. Retested, loop_init
> still causes the same blk-mq problem.


> [  100.063323] blk_mq_sysfs_init: init hctx_kobj fffff800ad8b95f8 0
> [  100.135151] blk_mq_sysfs_init: init ctx_kobj fffff800af80cdd8 0
> [  100.205952] blk_mq_sysfs_init: init ctx_kobj 00000000009f2dd8 1
> [  100.276785] kobject (00000000009f2dd8): tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong.

>From the debug log, the issue happened on ctx_kobj which is one
percpu variable, and looks it can't be initialized by blk-mq more than
one time.

I suspect it may be one memory issue, especiall in percpu allocation.
The percpu variable's address for the offline CPU1 is a bit special, not
like the other two online CPUs. And it might be helpful to enalbe
'Per cpu operations test' in' Kernel hacking  --->'/'Runtime Testing'
of Kconfig to see if it can pass the test.

Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/