[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151004163836.GA19652@htj.duckdns.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 12:38:36 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] signal: turn dequeue_signal_lock() into
kernel_dequeue_signal()
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 08:13:36PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> 1. Rename dequeue_signal_lock() to kernel_dequeue_signal(). This
> matches another "for kthreads only" kernel_sigaction() helper.
>
> 2. Remove the "tsk" and "mask" arguments, they are always current
> and current->blocked. And it is simply wrong if tsk != current.
>
> 3. We could also remove the 3rd "siginfo_t *info" arg but it looks
> potentially useful. However we can simplify the callers if we
> change kernel_dequeue_signal() to accept info => NULL.
>
> 4. Remove _irqsave, it is never called from atomic context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
FWIW, looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists