[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1443986381-14412-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 21:19:39 +0200
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] Inode security label invalidation
Since the first attempt at making selinux work on top of gfs2 and similar file
systems [1] was met with resistance by Christoph, here is another attempt that
doesn't require any additional inode operations, but also doesn't guarantee
full consistency of inode security labels: in case we cannot reload an invalid
label immediately, we keep using the old one.
The xattr cleanups that were part of [1] have been split off and posted
separately [2]; they seem to be okay.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Andreas
[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/655294/
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/4/137
Andreas Gruenbacher (2):
security: Add hook to invalidate inode security labels
gfs2: Invalide security labels of inodes that go invalid
fs/gfs2/glops.c | 2 ++
include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 6 ++++++
include/linux/security.h | 5 +++++
security/security.c | 8 ++++++++
security/selinux/hooks.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
security/selinux/include/objsec.h | 3 ++-
6 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.5.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists