[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <482d18783d6df356809b67431de95addfa20aa79.1444051018.git.geliangtang@163.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 21:26:04 +0800
From: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@....com>
To: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>
Cc: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@....com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] scsi: drop unlikely behind BUG_ON()
(1) For !CONFIG_BUG cases, the bug call is a no-op, so we couldn't care
less and the change is ok.
(2) ppc and mips, which HAVE_ARCH_BUG_ON, do not rely on branch predictions
as it seems to be pointless[1] and thus callers should not be trying to
push an optimization in the first place.
(3) For CONFIG_BUG and !HAVE_ARCH_BUG_ON cases, BUG_ON() contains an
unlikely compiler flag already.
Hence, we can drop unlikely behind BUG_ON().
[1] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1101.3/02289.html
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@....com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Just rewrite the commit log.
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index f570b48..3b5faab 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -1164,8 +1164,8 @@ int scsi_init_io(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
count = blk_rq_map_integrity_sg(rq->q, rq->bio,
prot_sdb->table.sgl);
- BUG_ON(unlikely(count > ivecs));
- BUG_ON(unlikely(count > queue_max_integrity_segments(rq->q)));
+ BUG_ON(count > ivecs);
+ BUG_ON(count > queue_max_integrity_segments(rq->q));
cmd->prot_sdb = prot_sdb;
cmd->prot_sdb->table.nents = count;
--
2.5.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists