[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56128238.8010305@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:59:20 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
dev@...nvswitch.org, Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ovs: do not allocate memory from offline numa node
On 10/02/2015 12:18 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> When openvswitch tries allocate memory from offline numa node 0:
> stats = kmem_cache_alloc_node(flow_stats_cache, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, 0)
> It catches VM_BUG_ON(nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_online(nid))
> [ replaced with VM_WARN_ON(!node_online(nid)) recently ] in linux/gfp.h
> This patch disables numa affinity in this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
...
> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
> index f2ea83ba4763..c7f74aab34b9 100644
> --- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
> +++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
> @@ -93,7 +93,8 @@ struct sw_flow *ovs_flow_alloc(void)
>
> /* Initialize the default stat node. */
> stats = kmem_cache_alloc_node(flow_stats_cache,
> - GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, 0);
> + GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO,
> + node_online(0) ? 0 : NUMA_NO_NODE);
Stupid question: can node 0 become offline between this check, and the
VM_WARN_ON? :) BTW what kind of system has node 0 offline?
> if (!stats)
> goto err;
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists