| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20151005130732.639d81da@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 13:07:32 -0400
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>
Cc: Gilad Ben Yossef <giladb@...hip.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rik van Riel" <riel@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/11] task_isolation: add debug boot flag
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:17:20 -0400
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com> wrote:
> The new "task_isolation_debug" flag simplifies debugging
> of TASK_ISOLATION kernels when processes are running in
> PR_TASK_ISOLATION_ENABLE mode. Such processes should get no
> interrupts from the kernel, and if they do, when this boot flag is
> specified a kernel stack dump on the console is generated.
>
> It's possible to use ftrace to simply detect whether a task_isolation
> core has unexpectedly entered the kernel. But what this boot flag
> does is allow the kernel to provide better diagnostics, e.g. by
> reporting in the IPI-generating code what remote core and context
> is preparing to deliver an interrupt to a task_isolation core.
>
> It may be worth considering other ways to generate useful debugging
> output rather than console spew, but for now that is simple and direct.
Honest question: does any of the task_isolation_debug() calls added
by this patch take care of the case where vmstat_shepherd() may
schedule vmstat_update() to run because a TASK_ISOLATION process is
changing memory stats?
If that's not taken care of yet, should we? I just don't know if we
should call task_isolation_exception() or task_isolation_debug().
In the case of the latter, wouldn't it be interesting to add it to
__queue_work() then?
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>
> ---
> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 7 +++++++
> include/linux/isolation.h | 2 ++
> kernel/irq_work.c | 5 ++++-
> kernel/sched/core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/signal.c | 5 +++++
> kernel/smp.c | 4 ++++
> kernel/softirq.c | 7 +++++++
> 7 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 22a4b687ea5b..48ff15f3166f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -3623,6 +3623,13 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted.
> neutralize any effect of /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq.
> Useful for debugging.
>
> + task_isolation_debug [KNL]
> + In kernels built with CONFIG_TASK_ISOLATION and booted
> + in nohz_full= mode, this setting will generate console
> + backtraces when the kernel is about to interrupt a
> + task that has requested PR_TASK_ISOLATION_ENABLE
> + and is running on a nohz_full core.
> +
> tcpmhash_entries= [KNL,NET]
> Set the number of tcp_metrics_hash slots.
> Default value is 8192 or 16384 depending on total
> diff --git a/include/linux/isolation.h b/include/linux/isolation.h
> index 27a4469831c1..9f1747331a36 100644
> --- a/include/linux/isolation.h
> +++ b/include/linux/isolation.h
> @@ -18,11 +18,13 @@ extern void task_isolation_enter(void);
> extern void task_isolation_syscall(int nr);
> extern void task_isolation_exception(void);
> extern void task_isolation_wait(void);
> +extern void task_isolation_debug(int cpu);
> #else
> static inline bool task_isolation_enabled(void) { return false; }
> static inline void task_isolation_enter(void) { }
> static inline void task_isolation_syscall(int nr) { }
> static inline void task_isolation_exception(void) { }
> +static inline void task_isolation_debug(int cpu) { }
> #endif
>
> static inline bool task_isolation_strict(void)
> diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
> index cbf9fb899d92..745c2ea6a4e4 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq_work.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/notifier.h>
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> +#include <linux/isolation.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
>
>
> @@ -75,8 +76,10 @@ bool irq_work_queue_on(struct irq_work *work, int cpu)
> if (!irq_work_claim(work))
> return false;
>
> - if (llist_add(&work->llnode, &per_cpu(raised_list, cpu)))
> + if (llist_add(&work->llnode, &per_cpu(raised_list, cpu))) {
> + task_isolation_debug(cpu);
> arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
> + }
>
> return true;
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 3595403921bd..8ddabb0d7510 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@
> #include <linux/binfmts.h>
> #include <linux/context_tracking.h>
> #include <linux/compiler.h>
> +#include <linux/isolation.h>
>
> #include <asm/switch_to.h>
> #include <asm/tlb.h>
> @@ -743,6 +744,26 @@ bool sched_can_stop_tick(void)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TASK_ISOLATION
> +/* Enable debugging of any interrupts of task_isolation cores. */
> +static int task_isolation_debug_flag;
> +static int __init task_isolation_debug_func(char *str)
> +{
> + task_isolation_debug_flag = true;
> + return 1;
> +}
> +__setup("task_isolation_debug", task_isolation_debug_func);
> +
> +void task_isolation_debug(int cpu)
> +{
> + if (task_isolation_debug_flag && tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu) &&
> + (cpu_curr(cpu)->task_isolation_flags & PR_TASK_ISOLATION_ENABLE)) {
> + pr_err("Interrupt detected for task_isolation cpu %d\n", cpu);
> + dump_stack();
> + }
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> void sched_avg_update(struct rq *rq)
> {
> s64 period = sched_avg_period();
> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> index 0f6bbbe77b46..c6e09f0f7e24 100644
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -684,6 +684,11 @@ int dequeue_signal(struct task_struct *tsk, sigset_t *mask, siginfo_t *info)
> */
> void signal_wake_up_state(struct task_struct *t, unsigned int state)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TASK_ISOLATION
> + /* If the task is being killed, don't complain about task_isolation. */
> + if (state & TASK_WAKEKILL)
> + t->task_isolation_flags = 0;
> +#endif
> set_tsk_thread_flag(t, TIF_SIGPENDING);
> /*
> * TASK_WAKEKILL also means wake it up in the stopped/traced/killable
> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> index 07854477c164..b0bddff2693d 100644
> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/isolation.h>
>
> #include "smpboot.h"
>
> @@ -178,6 +179,7 @@ static int generic_exec_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *csd,
> * locking and barrier primitives. Generic code isn't really
> * equipped to do the right thing...
> */
> + task_isolation_debug(cpu);
> if (llist_add(&csd->llist, &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu)))
> arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
>
> @@ -457,6 +459,8 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
> }
>
> /* Send a message to all CPUs in the map */
> + for_each_cpu(cpu, cfd->cpumask)
> + task_isolation_debug(cpu);
> arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask);
>
> if (wait) {
> diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
> index 479e4436f787..ed762fec7265 100644
> --- a/kernel/softirq.c
> +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
> @@ -24,8 +24,10 @@
> #include <linux/ftrace.h>
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <linux/smpboot.h>
> +#include <linux/context_tracking.h>
> #include <linux/tick.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/isolation.h>
>
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #include <trace/events/irq.h>
> @@ -335,6 +337,11 @@ void irq_enter(void)
> _local_bh_enable();
> }
>
> + if (context_tracking_cpu_is_enabled() &&
> + context_tracking_in_user() &&
> + !in_interrupt())
> + task_isolation_debug(smp_processor_id());
> +
> __irq_enter();
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists