[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151005212057.396698cc@lse.epita.fr>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 21:20:57 +0200
From: Gabriel Laskar <gabriel@....epita.fr>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
stephen hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@...panasonic.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ABI/API" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] timerfd: expose uapi header
On Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:57:21 +0200
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Monday 05 October 2015 16:53:39 Gabriel Laskar wrote:
> > this patch expose the timerfd apis to the userland. It is already in
> > glibc header sys/timerfd.h but not synchronised, and missing the ioctl
> > number definition.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Laskar <gabriel@....epita.fr>
> >
>
> What happens if you include both sys/timerfd.h and linux/timerfd.h then?
It will conflict, yes, what should I do? make the kernel header in a
way that this will not conflict, or just patch the glibc headers too?
> > header-y += telephony.h
> > header-y += termios.h
> > header-y += thermal.h
> >+header-y += tiemrfd.h
> > header-y += time.h
> > header-y += times.h
> > header-y += timex.h
>
> s/tiemrfd/timerfd/
I miss that, I really need to me more careful about this. Will send a
correction for this part.
--
Gabriel Laskar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists