| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1444073830-21854-28-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 21:36:54 +0200
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 27/43] richacl: Isolate the owner and group classes
When applying the file masks to an acl, we need to ensure that no
process gets more permissions than allowed by its file mask.
This may require inserting an owner@ deny ace to ensure this if the
owner mask contains fewer permissions than the group or other mask. For
example, when applying mode 0446 to the following acl:
everyone@:rw::allow
A deny ace needs to be inserted so that the owner won't get elevated
write access:
owner@:w::deny
everyone@:rw::allow
Likewise, we may need to insert group class deny aces if the group mask
contains fewer permissions than the other mask. For example, when
applying mode 0646 to the following acl:
owner@:rw::allow
everyone@:rw::allow
A deny ace needs to be inserted so that the owning group won't get
elevated write access:
owner@:rw::allow
group@:w::deny
everyone@:rw::allow
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
---
fs/richacl_compat.c | 223 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 223 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/richacl_compat.c b/fs/richacl_compat.c
index 21ee31e..7e25343 100644
--- a/fs/richacl_compat.c
+++ b/fs/richacl_compat.c
@@ -503,3 +503,226 @@ richacl_set_other_permissions(struct richacl_alloc *alloc, unsigned int *added)
}
return 0;
}
+
+/**
+ * richacl_max_allowed - maximum permissions that anybody is allowed
+ */
+static unsigned int
+richacl_max_allowed(struct richacl *acl)
+{
+ struct richace *ace;
+ unsigned int allowed = 0;
+
+ richacl_for_each_entry_reverse(ace, acl) {
+ if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace))
+ continue;
+ if (richace_is_allow(ace))
+ allowed |= ace->e_mask;
+ else if (richace_is_deny(ace)) {
+ if (richace_is_everyone(ace))
+ allowed &= ~ace->e_mask;
+ }
+ }
+ return allowed;
+}
+
+/**
+ * richacl_isolate_owner_class - limit the owner class to the owner file mask
+ * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries
+ *
+ * POSIX requires that after a chmod, the owner class is granted no more
+ * permissions than the owner file permission bits. For richacls, this
+ * means that the owner class must not be granted any permissions that the
+ * owner mask does not include.
+ *
+ * When we apply file masks to an acl which grant more permissions to the group
+ * or other class than to the owner class, we may end up in a situation where
+ * the owner is granted additional permissions from other aces. For example,
+ * given this acl:
+ *
+ * everyone@:rwx::allow
+ *
+ * when file masks corresponding to mode 0406 are applied, after
+ * richacl_propagate_everyone() and __richacl_apply_masks(), we end up with:
+ *
+ * owner@:r::allow
+ * everyone@:rw::allow
+ *
+ * This acl still grants the owner rw access through the everyone@ allow ace.
+ * To fix this, we must deny the owner w access:
+ *
+ * owner@:w::deny
+ * owner@:r::allow
+ * everyone@:rw::allow
+ */
+static int
+richacl_isolate_owner_class(struct richacl_alloc *alloc)
+{
+ struct richacl *acl = alloc->acl;
+ struct richace *ace;
+ unsigned int deny;
+
+ deny = richacl_max_allowed(acl) & ~acl->a_owner_mask;
+ if (!deny)
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Figure out if we can update an existig OWNER@ DENY entry.
+ */
+ richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) {
+ if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace))
+ continue;
+ if (richace_is_allow(ace))
+ break;
+ if (richace_is_owner(ace))
+ return richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace,
+ ace->e_mask | deny);
+ }
+
+ /* Insert an owner@ deny entry at the front. */
+ ace = acl->a_entries;
+ if (richacl_insert_entry(alloc, &ace))
+ return -1;
+ ace->e_type = RICHACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE;
+ ace->e_flags = RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO;
+ ace->e_mask = deny;
+ ace->e_id.special = RICHACE_OWNER_SPECIAL_ID;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * __richacl_isolate_who - isolate entry from everyone@ allow entry
+ * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries
+ * @who: identifier to isolate
+ * @deny: permissions this identifier should not be allowed
+ *
+ * See richacl_isolate_group_class().
+ */
+static int
+__richacl_isolate_who(struct richacl_alloc *alloc, struct richace *who,
+ unsigned int deny)
+{
+ struct richacl *acl = alloc->acl;
+ struct richace *ace, who_copy;
+ int n;
+
+ /*
+ * Compute the permissions already defined for @who. There are no
+ * everyone@ deny aces left in the acl at this stage.
+ */
+ richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) {
+ if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace))
+ continue;
+ if (richace_is_same_identifier(ace, who))
+ deny &= ~ace->e_mask;
+ }
+ if (!deny)
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Figure out if we can update an existig deny entry. Start from the
+ * entry before the trailing everyone@ allow entry. We will not hit
+ * everyone@ entries in the loop.
+ */
+ for (n = acl->a_count - 2; n != -1; n--) {
+ ace = acl->a_entries + n;
+ if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace))
+ continue;
+ if (richace_is_deny(ace)) {
+ if (richace_is_same_identifier(ace, who))
+ return richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace,
+ ace->e_mask | deny);
+ } else if (richace_is_allow(ace) &&
+ (ace->e_mask & deny))
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Insert a new entry before the trailing everyone@ deny entry.
+ */
+ richace_copy(&who_copy, who);
+ ace = acl->a_entries + acl->a_count - 1;
+ if (richacl_insert_entry(alloc, &ace))
+ return -1;
+ richace_copy(ace, &who_copy);
+ ace->e_type = RICHACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE;
+ ace->e_flags &= ~RICHACE_INHERITANCE_FLAGS;
+ ace->e_mask = deny;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * richacl_isolate_group_class - limit the group class to the group file mask
+ * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries
+ * @deny: additional permissions to deny
+ *
+ * POSIX requires that after a chmod, the group class is granted no more
+ * permissions than the group file permission bits. For richacls, this
+ * means that the group class must not be granted any permissions that the
+ * group mask does not include.
+ *
+ * When we apply file masks to an acl which grant more permissions to the other
+ * class than to the group class, we may end up in a situation where processes
+ * in the group class are granted additional permission from other aces. For
+ * example, given this acl:
+ *
+ * joe:rwx::allow
+ * everyone@:rwx::allow
+ *
+ * when file masks corresponding to mode 0646 are applied, after
+ * richacl_propagate_everyone() and __richacl_apply_masks(), we end up with:
+ *
+ * joe:r::allow
+ * owner@:rw::allow
+ * group@:r::allow
+ * everyone@:rw::allow
+ *
+ * This acl still grants joe and group@ rw access through the everyone@ allow
+ * ace. To fix this, we must deny w access to group class aces before the
+ * everyone@ allow ace at the end of the acl:
+ *
+ * joe:r::allow
+ * owner@:rw::allow
+ * group@:r::allow
+ * joe:w::deny
+ * group@:w::deny
+ * everyone@:rw::allow
+ */
+static int
+richacl_isolate_group_class(struct richacl_alloc *alloc, unsigned int deny)
+{
+ struct richace who = {
+ .e_flags = RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO,
+ .e_id.special = RICHACE_GROUP_SPECIAL_ID,
+ };
+ struct richace *ace;
+
+ if (!alloc->acl->a_count)
+ return 0;
+ ace = alloc->acl->a_entries + alloc->acl->a_count - 1;
+ if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace) || !richace_is_everyone(ace))
+ return 0;
+ deny |= ace->e_mask & ~alloc->acl->a_group_mask;
+
+ if (deny) {
+ unsigned int n;
+
+ if (__richacl_isolate_who(alloc, &who, deny))
+ return -1;
+ /*
+ * Start from the entry before the trailing everyone@ allow
+ * entry. We will not hit everyone@ entries in the loop.
+ */
+ for (n = alloc->acl->a_count - 2; n != -1; n--) {
+ ace = alloc->acl->a_entries + n;
+
+ if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace) ||
+ richace_is_owner(ace) ||
+ richace_is_group(ace))
+ continue;
+ if (__richacl_isolate_who(alloc, ace, deny))
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.5.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists