[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151005194824.GF3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 21:48:24 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E.McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] asm-generic: Add _{relaxed|acquire|release}()
variants for inc/dec atomics
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:32:43PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 07:39:10AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 01:03:11PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > > Similar to what we have for regular add/sub calls. For now, no actual arch
> > > implements them, so everyone falls back to the default atomics... iow,
> > > nothing changes. These will be used in future primitives.
> > >
> >
> > Maybe also do an aargh64 patch for this?
>
> I can follow up with that, since I'm about 60% through adding the
> relaxed/acquire/release versions of all the other primitives. It's a fair
> amount of work thanks to the new atomic instructions making me do everything
> twice... (that and I've been on holiday this past week!)
Right, what I meant was arm (I thought argh64 was the one with _relaxed
bits in, but my memories tricked me, it was ARM).
If you add new _relaxed ops, we'd better convert all archs that support
_relaxed, which would be ARM (for now).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists