[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151005201233.GA31314@potion.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 22:12:34 +0200
From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>,
Mihai Donțu <mdontu@...defender.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] KVM: x86: Use the correct vcpu's TSC rate to
compute time scale
2015-09-28 13:38+0800, Haozhong Zhang:
> This patch makes KVM use virtual_tsc_khz rather than the host TSC rate
> as vcpu's TSC rate to compute the time scale if TSC scaling is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@...el.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -1782,7 +1782,9 @@ static int kvm_guest_time_update(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
> return 0;
>
> if (unlikely(vcpu->hw_tsc_khz != this_tsc_khz)) {
> - kvm_get_time_scale(NSEC_PER_SEC / 1000, this_tsc_khz,
> + tgt_tsc_khz = kvm_has_tsc_control ?
> + vcpu->virtual_tsc_khz : this_tsc_khz;
> + kvm_get_time_scale(NSEC_PER_SEC / 1000, tgt_tsc_khz,
> &vcpu->hv_clock.tsc_shift,
> &vcpu->hv_clock.tsc_to_system_mul);
Good catch, it seems that SVM didn't scale kvmclock correctly ...
I think we'll want this patch in stable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists