[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151005215455.GA7608@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 00:54:55 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: hjk@...sjkoch.de, gregkh@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dev@...k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] uio: new driver to support PCI MSI-X
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 11:33:06AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Just forwarding events is not enough to make a valid driver.
> What is missing is a way to access the device in a safe way.
Thinking about it some more, maybe some devices don't do DMA, and merely
signal events with MSI/MSI-X.
The fact you mention igb_uio in the cover letter seems to hint that this
isn't the case, and that the real intent is to abuse it for DMA-capable
devices, but still ...
If we assume such a simple device, we need to block userspace from
tweaking at least the MSI control and the MSI-X table.
And changing BARs might make someone else corrupt the MSI-X
table, so we need to block it from changing BARs, too.
Things like device reset will clear the table. I guess this means we
need to track access to reset, too, make sure we restore the
table to a sane config.
PM capability can be used to reset things tooI think. Better be
careful about that.
And a bunch of devices could be doing weird things that need
to be special-cased.
All of this is what VFIO is already dealing with.
Maybe extending VFIO for this usecase, or finding another way to share
code might be a better idea than duplicating the code within uio?
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists