[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151006071347.GB14093@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 09:13:47 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] bpf: enable non-root eBPF programs
* Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> wrote:
> On 10/5/15 3:14 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >One scenario that comes to mind ... what happens when there are kernel
> >pointers stored in skb->cb[] (either from the current layer or an old
> >one from a different layer that the skb went through previously, but
> >which did not get overwritten)?
> >
> >Socket filters could read a portion of skb->cb[] also when unprived and
> >leak that out through maps. I think the verifier doesn't catch that,
> >right?
>
> grrr. indeed. previous layer before sk_filter() can leave junk in there.
Could this be solved by activating zeroing/sanitizing of this data if there's an
active BPF function around that can access that socket?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists