linux-kernel - Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v3] arm: Adding support for atomic half word exchange

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <795992290.5810091444118582583.JavaMail.weblogic@epmlwas01d>
Date:	Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:03:05 +0000 (GMT)
From:	Sarbojit Ganguly <ganguly.s@...sung.com>
To:	Sarbojit Ganguly <ganguly.s@...sung.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	"Waiman.Long@...com" <Waiman.Long@...com>,
	"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	VIKRAM MUPPARTHI <vikram.m@...sung.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	SUNEEL KUMAR SURIMANI <suneel@...sung.com>,
	SHARAN ALLUR <sharan.allur@...sung.com>,
	"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v3] arm: Adding support for atomic half word
 exchange


Hello Will
Here is the version 3 of the patch correcting earlier issues.

v2 -> v3 : Removed the comment related to Qspinlock, changed !defined to
#ifndef.
v1 -> v2 : Extended the guard code to cover the byte exchange case as 
well following opinion of Will Deacon.
Checkpatch has been run and issues were taken care of.

Since support for half-word atomic exchange was not there and Qspinlock
on ARM requires it, modified __xchg() to add support for that as well.
ARMv6 and lower does not support ldrex{b,h} so, added a guard code
to prevent build breaks.

Signed-off-by: Sarbojit Ganguly <ganguly.s@...sung.com>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
index 916a274..c6436c1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __xchg(unsigned long x, volatile void *ptr, int size
 
 	switch (size) {
 #if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6
+#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_V6 /* MIN ARCH >= V6K */
 	case 1:
 		asm volatile("@	__xchg1\n"
 		"1:	ldrexb	%0, [%3]\n"
@@ -49,6 +50,17 @@ static inline unsigned long __xchg(unsigned long x, volatile void *ptr, int size
 			: "r" (x), "r" (ptr)
 			: "memory", "cc");
 		break;
+	case 2:
+		asm volatile("@	__xchg2\n"
+		"1:	ldrexh	%0, [%3]\n"
+		"	strexh	%1, %2, [%3]\n"
+		"	teq	%1, #0\n"
+		"	bne	1b"
+			: "=&r" (ret), "=&r" (tmp)
+			: "r" (x), "r" (ptr)
+			: "memory", "cc");
+		break;
+#endif
 	case 4:
 		asm volatile("@	__xchg4\n"
 		"1:	ldrex	%0, [%3]\n"
-- 
1.9.1


------- Original Message -------
Sender : Sarbojit Ganguly<ganguly.s@...sung.com> Technical Lead/SRI-Bangalore-AP Systems 1/Samsung Electronics
Date : Oct 06, 2015 08:38 (GMT+05:30)
Title : Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v2] arm: Adding support for atomic half word exchange

Hello Will,

Thank you so much for the review. I have thought it over and it makes
sense not to have that comment in cmpxchg.h, I will also change !defined to
#ifndef and quickly post a v3.

Regards,
Sarbojit

------- Original Message -------
Sender : Will Deacon
Date : Oct 05, 2015 21:30 (GMT+05:30)
Title : Re: Re: [PATCH v2] arm: Adding support for atomic half word exchange

On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:10:53PM +0000, Sarbojit Ganguly wrote:
> My sincere apologies for the format issue. This was due to the e-mail editor
> which reformats the text.
> I am reposting the patch, please let me know if it is ok this time.
> 
> 
> v1-->v2 : Extended the guard code to cover the byte exchange case as 
> well following opinion of Will Deacon.
> Checkpatch has been run and issues were taken care of.
> 
> Since support for half-word atomic exchange was not there and Qspinlock
> on ARM requires it, modified __xchg() to add support for that as well.
> ARMv6 and lower does not support ldrex{b,h} so, added a guard code
> to prevent build breaks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sarbojit Ganguly 
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> index 916a274..a53cbeb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __xchg(unsigned long x, volatile void *ptr, int size
>  
>   switch (size) {
>  #if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_CPU_V6)

#ifndef ? (to match the __cmpxchg code).

>   case 1:
>   asm volatile("@ __xchg1\n"
>   "1: ldrexb %0, [%3]\n"
> @@ -49,6 +50,22 @@ static inline unsigned long __xchg(unsigned long x, volatile void *ptr, int size
>   : "r" (x), "r" (ptr)
>   : "memory", "cc");
>   break;
> +
> + /*
> + * Half-word atomic exchange, required
> + * for Qspinlock support on ARM.
> + */

I think I said it before, but I don't think this comment is of any real
value.

Other than those, this looks ok to me.

Will