lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2015 17:56:28 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 03/38] perf tools: Move auxtrace_mmap field to struct perf_evlist

On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 3:45 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> Em Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 02:18:44PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> Since it's gonna share struct mmap with dummy tracking evsel to track
>> meta events only, let's move auxtrace out of struct perf_mmap.
>
> Is this moving around _strictly_ needed?

In the later patch, I added another perf_mmap instance for dummy
tracking events. So keeping auxtrace_mmap in the perf_mmap is a
duplication.  It's not strictly needed but will waste some memory.

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists