lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cgXNKmOFgLB7DEOnzyU=rfM=NVs_rBaWMDE4pUcbCD3eQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 17:56:28 +0900 From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 03/38] perf tools: Move auxtrace_mmap field to struct perf_evlist On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 3:45 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote: > Em Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 02:18:44PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu: >> Since it's gonna share struct mmap with dummy tracking evsel to track >> meta events only, let's move auxtrace out of struct perf_mmap. > > Is this moving around _strictly_ needed? In the later patch, I added another perf_mmap instance for dummy tracking events. So keeping auxtrace_mmap in the perf_mmap is a duplication. It's not strictly needed but will waste some memory. Thanks, Namhyung -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists