[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cgXNKmOFgLB7DEOnzyU=rfM=NVs_rBaWMDE4pUcbCD3eQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 17:56:28 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 03/38] perf tools: Move auxtrace_mmap field to struct perf_evlist
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 3:45 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> Em Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 02:18:44PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> Since it's gonna share struct mmap with dummy tracking evsel to track
>> meta events only, let's move auxtrace out of struct perf_mmap.
>
> Is this moving around _strictly_ needed?
In the later patch, I added another perf_mmap instance for dummy
tracking events. So keeping auxtrace_mmap in the perf_mmap is a
duplication. It's not strictly needed but will waste some memory.
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists