linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/12] KVM: x86: Replace call-back set_tsc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5613A531.5050506@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:40:49 +0200
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
	Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mihai Donțu <mdontu@...defender.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] KVM: x86: Replace call-back set_tsc_khz() with a
 common function



On 06/10/2015 06:06, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> Alternatively, it's also possible to follow David's comment to use
> divq on x86_64 to keep both precision and safety. On i386, it just
> falls back to above truncating approach.

khz is just 32 bits, so we can do a 96/32 division.  And because this is
a slow path, we can code a generic u64*u32/u32 function and use it to do
(1 << kvm_tsc_scaling_ratio_frac_bits) * khz / tsc_khz:

diff --git a/include/linux/math64.h b/include/linux/math64.h
index c45c089bfdac..5b70af4fa386 100644
--- a/include/linux/math64.h
+++ b/include/linux/math64.h
@@ -142,6 +142,13 @@ static inline u64 mul_u64_u32_shr(u64 a, u32 mul,
unsigned int shift)
 }
 #endif /* mul_u64_u32_shr */

+#ifndef mul_u64_u32_div
+static inline u64 mul_u64_u32_div(u64 x, u32 num, u32 den)
+{
+	return (u64)(((unsigned __int128)a * mul) / den);
+}
+#endif
+
 #else

 #ifndef mul_u64_u32_shr
@@ -161,6 +168,35 @@ static inline u64 mul_u64_u32_shr(u64 a, u32 mul,
unsigned int shift)
 }
 #endif /* mul_u64_u32_shr */

+#ifndef mul_u64_u32_div
+static inline u64 mul_u64_u32_div(u64 a, u32 num, u32 den)
+{
+	union {
+		u64 ll;
+		struct {
+#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
+			u32 high, low;
+#else
+			u32 low, high;
+#endif
+		} l;
+	} u, rl, rh;
+
+	u.ll = a;
+	rl.ll = (u64)u.l.low * num;
+	rh.ll = (u64)u.l.high * num + rl.l.high;
+
+	/* Bits 32-63 of the result will be in rh.l.low.  */
+	rl.l.high = do_div(rh.ll, den);
+
+	/* Bits 0-31 of the result will be in rl.l.low.  */
+	do_div(rl.ll, den);
+
+	rl.l.high = rh.l.low;
+	return rl.ll;
+}
+#endif
+
 #endif

 #endif /* _LINUX_MATH64_H */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/