linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] falloc: expose ioctl numbers into uapi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2015 14:38:13 +0200
From:	Gabriel Laskar <gabriel@....epita.fr>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
	Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@...sung.com>,
	Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:ABI/API" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] falloc: expose ioctl numbers into uapi

On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 10:40:04 +0200
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:

> On Monday 05 October 2015 20:44:30 Gabriel Laskar wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Laskar <gabriel@....epita.fr>
> > 
> 
> Did you see my 'Acked-by' reply? When you a reply like that,
> you should normally add that tag below your 'Signed-off-by'
> so it doesn't get lost.
> 
> Other than that, I think you should write a changelog text above
> about how you discovered it and why it should be done like this.

I am sorry, my answer was misplaced (wrong reply-to), I will resend a
new version of all the patchset with complete changelog. I am just
waiting for a ack/nack on the mce one.


-- 
Gabriel Laskar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/