| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 17:21:59 +0200
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] kernel/cpu.c: make set_cpu_* static inlines
Almost all callers of the set_cpu_* functions pass an explicit true
or false. Making them static inline thus replaces the function calls
with a simple set_bit/clear_bit, saving some .text.
Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
---
include/linux/cpumask.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
kernel/cpu.c | 34 ----------------------------------
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
index 52ab539aefce..fc14275ff34e 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -720,14 +720,49 @@ extern const DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_all_bits, NR_CPUS);
#define for_each_present_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_present_mask)
/* Wrappers for arch boot code to manipulate normally-constant masks */
-void set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible);
-void set_cpu_present(unsigned int cpu, bool present);
-void set_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu, bool online);
-void set_cpu_active(unsigned int cpu, bool active);
void init_cpu_present(const struct cpumask *src);
void init_cpu_possible(const struct cpumask *src);
void init_cpu_online(const struct cpumask *src);
+static inline void
+set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible)
+{
+ if (possible)
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_possible_mask);
+ else
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_possible_mask);
+}
+
+static inline void
+set_cpu_present(unsigned int cpu, bool present)
+{
+ if (present)
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_present_mask);
+ else
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_present_mask);
+}
+
+static inline void
+set_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu, bool online)
+{
+ if (online) {
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_online_mask);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_active_mask);
+ } else {
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_online_mask);
+ }
+}
+
+static inline void
+set_cpu_active(unsigned int cpu, bool active)
+{
+ if (active)
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_active_mask);
+ else
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_active_mask);
+}
+
+
/**
* to_cpumask - convert an NR_CPUS bitmap to a struct cpumask *
* @bitmap: the bitmap
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index dd70f600442f..5210d80efc28 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -788,40 +788,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_present_mask);
struct cpumask __cpu_active_mask __read_mostly;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_active_mask);
-void set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible)
-{
- if (possible)
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_possible_mask);
- else
- cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_possible_mask);
-}
-
-void set_cpu_present(unsigned int cpu, bool present)
-{
- if (present)
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_present_mask);
- else
- cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_present_mask);
-}
-
-void set_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu, bool online)
-{
- if (online) {
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_online_mask);
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_active_mask);
- } else {
- cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_online_mask);
- }
-}
-
-void set_cpu_active(unsigned int cpu, bool active)
-{
- if (active)
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_active_mask);
- else
- cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_active_mask);
-}
-
void init_cpu_present(const struct cpumask *src)
{
cpumask_copy(&__cpu_present_mask, src);
--
2.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists