[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1444148028-11551-13-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 09:13:48 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
bobby.prani@...il.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/13] rculist: Use WRITE_ONCE() when deleting from reader-visible list
The various RCU list-deletion macros (list_del_rcu(),
hlist_del_init_rcu(), hlist_del_rcu(), hlist_bl_del_init_rcu(),
hlist_bl_del_rcu(), hlist_nulls_del_init_rcu(), and hlist_nulls_del_rcu())
do plain stores into the ->next pointer of the preceding list elemment.
Unfortunately, the compiler is within its rights to (for example) use
byte-at-a-time writes to update the pointer, which would fatally confuse
concurrent readers. This patch therefore adds the needed WRITE_ONCE()
macros.
KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN) reported the __hlist_del() issue, which
is a problem when __hlist_del() is invoked by hlist_del_rcu().
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/list.h | 5 +++--
include/linux/list_bl.h | 5 +++--
include/linux/list_nulls.h | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/list.h b/include/linux/list.h
index 3e3e64a61002..993395a2e55c 100644
--- a/include/linux/list.h
+++ b/include/linux/list.h
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static inline void list_add_tail(struct list_head *new, struct list_head *head)
static inline void __list_del(struct list_head * prev, struct list_head * next)
{
next->prev = prev;
- prev->next = next;
+ WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, next);
}
/**
@@ -615,7 +615,8 @@ static inline void __hlist_del(struct hlist_node *n)
{
struct hlist_node *next = n->next;
struct hlist_node **pprev = n->pprev;
- *pprev = next;
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(*pprev, next);
if (next)
next->pprev = pprev;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/list_bl.h b/include/linux/list_bl.h
index 2eb88556c5c5..8132214e8efd 100644
--- a/include/linux/list_bl.h
+++ b/include/linux/list_bl.h
@@ -93,9 +93,10 @@ static inline void __hlist_bl_del(struct hlist_bl_node *n)
LIST_BL_BUG_ON((unsigned long)n & LIST_BL_LOCKMASK);
/* pprev may be `first`, so be careful not to lose the lock bit */
- *pprev = (struct hlist_bl_node *)
+ WRITE_ONCE(*pprev,
+ (struct hlist_bl_node *)
((unsigned long)next |
- ((unsigned long)*pprev & LIST_BL_LOCKMASK));
+ ((unsigned long)*pprev & LIST_BL_LOCKMASK)));
if (next)
next->pprev = pprev;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/list_nulls.h b/include/linux/list_nulls.h
index f266661d2666..444d2b1313bd 100644
--- a/include/linux/list_nulls.h
+++ b/include/linux/list_nulls.h
@@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ static inline void __hlist_nulls_del(struct hlist_nulls_node *n)
{
struct hlist_nulls_node *next = n->next;
struct hlist_nulls_node **pprev = n->pprev;
- *pprev = next;
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(*pprev, next);
if (!is_a_nulls(next))
next->pprev = pprev;
}
--
2.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists