linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] bpf: enable non-root eBPF programs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2015 10:50:36 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] bpf: enable non-root eBPF programs

On 10/6/15 1:39 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> [...] Also classic BPF would then need to test for it, since a socket
>>> filter
>>> doesn't really know whether native eBPF is loaded there or a
>>> classic-to-eBPF
>>> transformed one, and classic never makes use of this. Anyway, it
>>> could be done
>>> by adding a bit flag cb_access:1 to the bpf_prog, set it during eBPF
>>> verification phase, and test it inside sk_filter() if I see it
>>> correctly.
>>
>> That could also be done in an unlikely() branch, to keep the cost to
>> the non-eBPF
>> case near zero.
>
> Yes, agreed. For the time being, the majority of users are coming from the
> classic BPF side anyway and the unlikely() could still be changed later on
> if it should not be the case anymore. The flag and bpf_func would share the
> same cacheline as well.

was also thinking that we can do it only in paths that actually
have multiple protocol layers, since today bpf is mainly used with
tcpdump(raw_socket) and new af_packet fanout both have cb cleared
on RX, because it just came out of alloc_skb and no layers were called,
and on TX we can clear 20 bytes in dev_queue_xmit_nit().
af_unix/netlink also have clean skb. Need to analyze tun and sctp...
but it feels overly fragile to save a branch in sk_filter,
so planning to go with
if(unlikely(prog->cb_access)) memset in sk_filter().

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/