[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1510061410450.27916@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 14:17:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] block: flush queued bios when the process blocks
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> FYI, I've put rebased versions of your 2 patches in my wip branch, see:
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/snitzer/linux.git/log/?h=wip
I found a bug in the first patch
(http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/snitzer/linux.git/commit/?h=wip&id=2e90df2e9cf482f45be4230152535fdab525fbd8)
There is this piece of code:
spin_lock(&bs->rescue_lock);
bio_list_add(&bs->rescue_list, bio);
spin_unlock(&bs->rescue_lock);
queue_work(bs->rescue_workqueue, &bs->rescue_work);
It is possible that after spin_unlock and before queue_work the bio is
finished by previous workqueue invocation. When the bio is finished, it is
possible that the block device is unloaded and queue_work accesses freed
memory.
Change the code so that queue_work is executed inside the spinlock:
spin_lock(&bs->rescue_lock);
bio_list_add(&bs->rescue_list, bio);
queue_work(bs->rescue_workqueue, &bs->rescue_work);
spin_unlock(&bs->rescue_lock);
Mikulas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists