linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM:mm: fix kmap_atomic_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2015 20:28:36 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Chanho Min <chanho.min@....com>, nico@...xnic.net
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@....com>,
	Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM:mm: fix kmap_atomic_to_page

On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 08:09:33PM +0900, Chanho Min wrote:
> Since kmap_atomic returns the pkmap address without a new mapping to
> fixmap for the page that is already mapped by kmap, It should be
> considered for the pkmap address in kmap_atomic_to_page.

What's the reasoning behind this change, given that I can find lots of
definitions of kmap_atomic_to_page() in the kernel, but not a single
user of this.

If there's no users, should we be deleting this code?

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/