[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151006202937.GX3604@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 22:29:37 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/18] rcu: Move rcu_report_exp_rnp() to
allow consolidation
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 09:29:21AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> +static void __maybe_unused rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp,
> + struct rcu_node *rnp, bool wake)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + unsigned long mask;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
Normally we require a comment with barriers, explaining the order and
the pairing etc.. :-)
> + smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
> + for (;;) {
> + if (!sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp)) {
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> + break;
> + }
> + if (rnp->parent == NULL) {
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> + if (wake) {
> + smp_mb(); /* EGP done before wake_up(). */
> + wake_up(&rsp->expedited_wq);
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> + mask = rnp->grpmask;
> + raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled */
> + rnp = rnp->parent;
> + raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled */
> + smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
> + rnp->expmask &= ~mask;
> + }
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists