lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5614D759.8020405@nexus-software.ie> Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 09:27:05 +0100 From: Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie> To: "Kweh, Hock Leong" <hock.leong.kweh@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> CC: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>, Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Roy Franz <roy.franz@...aro.org>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, "Fleming, Matt" <matt.fleming@...el.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] efi: export efi_capsule_supported() function symbol On 07/10/15 03:01, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bryan O'Donoghue [mailto:pure.logic@...us-software.ie] >> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 10:54 PM >>>> >>>> Aside from that, I'm curious which types of capsules you've used here >>>> too - does it include the MFH header ? Keep in mind the initial >>>> firmware that shipped with Galileo will depend on that MFH being >> present. >>>> >>>> >> http://download.intel.com/support/processors/quark/sb/quark_secureboo >>>> t >>>> prm_330234_001.pdf >>>> - Section A1 - table 7 ? >>>> >>>> So if we boot a 4.x kernel with that initial firmware version 0.75 if >>>> memory serves - it's important that the capsule.c code handles the MFH. >>>> >>> >>> Already got agreement with Matt that Quark Security Header patch will >>> not be upstream to mainline as it is not a standard header. So Intel >>> will carry this patch ourselves. >> >> Right... so what sort of capsule are you testing with ? > > I am testing on Intel Galileo Gen 1 with bios version v0.7.5, v0.8.0, v1.0.1 & v1.0.2. > > Thanks & Regards, > Wilson > Hmm. That's pretty confusing. The 0.75 BIOS requires the MFH as far as I remember. If the capsule you are using doesn't have the MFH - how is this working ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists