linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/virtio: use %llu format string form atomic64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 07 Oct 2015 13:04:06 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/virtio: use %llu format string form atomic64_t

On Wednesday 07 October 2015 11:45:02 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 12:41:21PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The virtgpu driver prints the last_seq variable using the %ld or
> > %lu format string, which does not work correctly on all architectures
> > and causes this compiler warning on ARM:
> > 
> > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_fence.c: In function 'virtio_timeline_value_str':
> > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_fence.c:64:22: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'long long int' [-Wformat=]
> >   snprintf(str, size, "%lu", atomic64_read(&fence->drv->last_seq));
> >                       ^
> > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_debugfs.c: In function 'virtio_gpu_debugfs_irq_info':
> > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_debugfs.c:37:16: warning: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 3 has type 'long long int' [-Wformat=]
> >   seq_printf(m, "fence %ld %lld\n",
> >                 ^
> > 
> > In order to avoid the warnings, this changes the format strings to %llu
> > and adds a cast to u64, which makes it work the same way everywhere.
> 
> You have to wonder why atomic64_* functions do not use u64 types.
> If they're not reliant on manipulating 64-bit quantities, then what's
> the point of calling them atomic _64_.

I haven't checked all architectures, but I assume what happens is that
64-bit ones just #define atomic64_t atomic_long_t, so they don't have
to provide three sets of functions.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/