[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1444225608.3188.67.camel@opteya.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 15:46:48 +0200
From: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@....mellanox.co.il>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/core: avoid 32-bit warning
Hi,
Le mercredi 07 octobre 2015 à 16:19 +0300, Sagi Grimberg a écrit :
> On 10/7/2015 3:29 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The INIT_UDATA() macro requires a pointer or unsigned long argument
> > for
> > both input and output buffer, and all callers had a cast from when
> > the code was merged until a recent restructuring, so now we get
> >
> > core/uverbs_cmd.c: In function 'ib_uverbs_create_cq':
> > core/uverbs_cmd.c:1481:66: warning: cast to pointer from integer of
> > different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
> >
> > This makes the code behave as before by adding back the cast to
> > unsigned long.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > Fixes: 565197dd8fb1 ("IB/core: Extend ib_uverbs_create_cq")
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> > b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> > index be4cb9f04be3..88b3b78340f2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> > @@ -1478,7 +1478,7 @@ ssize_t ib_uverbs_create_cq(struct
> > ib_uverbs_file *file,
> > if (copy_from_user(&cmd, buf, sizeof(cmd)))
> > return -EFAULT;
> >
> > - INIT_UDATA(&ucore, buf, cmd.response, sizeof(cmd),
> > sizeof(resp));
> > + INIT_UDATA(&ucore, buf, (unsigned long)cmd.response,
> > sizeof(cmd), sizeof(resp));
>
> Would it make sense to cast inside INIT_UDATA() and not have callers
> worry about it?
It's ... complicated. See INIT_UDATA_BUF_OR_NULL().
Awayway, I have patch to do the opposite, eg. explicitly cast u64 value
to (void __user *)(unsigned long) in the caller function instead, as it
allows some safer / new operations on the response buffer.
Regards.
--
Yann Droneaud
OPTEYA
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists