lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20151007140527.GK12635@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 15:05:27 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: Bard Liao <bardliao@...ltek.com>,
Oder Chiou <oder_chiou@...ltek.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rt5645: fix build warning
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 05:52:12PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> We were getting build warning about "Section mismatch".
> dmi_platform_intel_broadwell is being referenced from the probe function
> rt5645_i2c_probe(), but dmi_platform_intel_broadwell was marked with
> __initdata.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>
> -static struct dmi_system_id dmi_platform_intel_broadwell[] __initdata = {
> +static struct dmi_system_id dmi_platform_intel_broadwell[] = {
This doesn't seem like the obvious fix - why are we not annotating the
probe function suitably (or alternatively if we can't why does
__initdata still exist)?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists