[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5614979C.30100@lge.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 12:55:08 +0900
From: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@....com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Chanho Min <chanho.min@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM:mm: fix kmap_atomic_to_page
Recently, we made a driver utilizing kmap_atomic_to_page. Of course, it's not mainlined. People may be using it outside mainline just like us.
vmalloc has vmalloc_to_page, pkmap has kmap_to page, and fixmap has kmap_atomic_to_page. Then.. how about letting virt_to_page do them all?
On 10/07/2015 10:37 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 08:09:33PM +0900, Chanho Min wrote:
>>> Since kmap_atomic returns the pkmap address without a new mapping to
>>> fixmap for the page that is already mapped by kmap, It should be
>>> considered for the pkmap address in kmap_atomic_to_page.
>> What's the reasoning behind this change, given that I can find lots of
>> definitions of kmap_atomic_to_page() in the kernel, but not a single
>> user of this.
>>
>> If there's no users, should we be deleting this code?
> I think commit 5bbeed12bdc3 provides the answer to that question.
>
>
> Nicolas
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists