[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-a76cf66e948afbaeda8e3ecc861f29c47a026c27@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 09:15:53 -0700
From: tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, dvlasenk@...hat.com, luto@...capital.net,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
brgerst@...il.com, luto@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:x86/asm] x86/uaccess:
Tell the compiler that uaccess is unlikely to fault
Commit-ID: a76cf66e948afbaeda8e3ecc861f29c47a026c27
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a76cf66e948afbaeda8e3ecc861f29c47a026c27
Author: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:47:49 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 11:34:06 +0200
x86/uaccess: Tell the compiler that uaccess is unlikely to fault
GCC doesn't realize that get_user(), put_user(), and their __
variants are unlikely to fail. Tell it.
I noticed this while playing with the C entry code.
Before:
text data bss dec filename
21828763 5194760 1277952 28301475 vmlinux.baseline
After:
text data bss dec filename
21828379 5194760 1277952 28301091 vmlinux.new
The generated code shrunk by 384 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/dc37bed7024319c3004d950d57151fca6aeacf97.1444091584.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
index a8df874..3e911c6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ __typeof__(__builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(x) > sizeof(0UL), 0ULL, 0UL))
: "=a" (__ret_gu), "=r" (__val_gu) \
: "0" (ptr), "i" (sizeof(*(ptr)))); \
(x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr))) __val_gu; \
- __ret_gu; \
+ __builtin_expect(__ret_gu, 0); \
})
#define __put_user_x(size, x, ptr, __ret_pu) \
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ extern void __put_user_8(void);
__put_user_x(X, __pu_val, ptr, __ret_pu); \
break; \
} \
- __ret_pu; \
+ __builtin_expect(__ret_pu, 0); \
})
#define __put_user_size(x, ptr, size, retval, errret) \
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ do { \
({ \
int __pu_err; \
__put_user_size((x), (ptr), (size), __pu_err, -EFAULT); \
- __pu_err; \
+ __builtin_expect(__pu_err, 0); \
})
#define __get_user_nocheck(x, ptr, size) \
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ do { \
unsigned long __gu_val; \
__get_user_size(__gu_val, (ptr), (size), __gu_err, -EFAULT); \
(x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr)))__gu_val; \
- __gu_err; \
+ __builtin_expect(__gu_err, 0); \
})
/* FIXME: this hack is definitely wrong -AK */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists