[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151007172024.GH2152@nanopsycho.orion>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 19:20:24 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: remove dsa.h from netdevice.h
Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 11:54:24PM CEST, vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com wrote:
>In order to push switchdev objects down to DSA drivers, I need to include
>switchdev.h in dsa.h. But compilation fails because of a circular dependency
>issue, since dsa.h is also included in linux/netdevice.h.
>
>dsa.h is included for two purposes: to have the definition of struct
>dsa_switch_tree; and to have access to dsa_uses_tagged_protocol(), used by
>netdev_uses_dsa().
>
>This patchset forward declares struct dsa_switch_tree; adds a new uses_hw_tag
>boolean to struct net_device, which is more explicit than the DSA helper, and
>finally get rid of the dsa.h include.
>
>With this patchset, switchdev.h can safely be included in dsa.h.
Looks fine to me. I think that you should push this along with your
other patchset which actually needs this.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists