[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151007173317.GG2278@lukather>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 18:33:17 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: hdmac: factorise memset descriptor
allocation
Hi Vinod,
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 02:54:13PM +0100, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 04:52:37PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> > +static struct at_desc *atc_create_memset_desc(struct dma_chan *chan,
> > + dma_addr_t psrc,
> > + dma_addr_t pdst,
> > + size_t len)
> > +{
> > + struct at_dma_chan *atchan = to_at_dma_chan(chan);
> > + struct at_desc *desc;
> > + size_t xfer_count;
> > +
> > + u32 ctrla = ATC_SRC_WIDTH(2) |
> > + ATC_DST_WIDTH(2);
>
> why is this over two lines :)
>
> > + u32 ctrlb = ATC_DEFAULT_CTRLB | ATC_IEN |
> > + ATC_SRC_ADDR_MODE_FIXED |
> > + ATC_DST_ADDR_MODE_INCR |
> > + ATC_FC_MEM2MEM;
> > +
> > + xfer_count = len >> 2;
> > + if (xfer_count > ATC_BTSIZE_MAX) {
> > + dev_err(chan2dev(chan), "%s: buffer is too big\n",
> > + __func__);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
>
> This is fine, but this is driver limitation. We should really split the
> txn to multiple descriptors here..
Both these things are actually just copy from the previous code.
I can probably fix the first style issue in this patch, but splitting
the memset descriptors should go in a separate patch.
>
> > @@ -914,46 +953,26 @@ atc_prep_dma_memset(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dest, int value,
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > - xfer_count = len >> 2;
> > - if (xfer_count > ATC_BTSIZE_MAX) {
> > - dev_err(chan2dev(chan), "%s: buffer is too big\n",
> > + vaddr = dma_pool_alloc(atdma->memset_pool, GFP_ATOMIC, &paddr);
>
> Mostly people use _zalloc variant, any reason why you don't want that
Not necessarily, but I don't need zeroed memory either, since I
overwrite the content right after the allocation.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists