lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20151007173934.GB10665@kroah.com> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 18:39:34 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: fix debugfs files for 64-bit On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:57:01PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 07-10-15, 18:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > Ok, then stop exporting it in debugfs and everyone will be happy :) > > Hehe, not really. See I am not happy :( Why not? Why does this have to be exported in debugfs? Just delete it, who cares about it? It's just "debugging". > So, what do you suggest? Should we create debugfs_create_ulong()? Ick, do we _really_ need and want that? > And how to implement that? With existing u32/u64 APIs or from scratch? It's probably easy to just do in a few lines "from scratch", if you really need/want it, right? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists