lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000f01d10131$59c67a60$0d536f20$@net>
Date:	Wed, 7 Oct 2015 11:52:42 -0700
From:	"Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@...us.net>
To:	"'Prarit Bhargava'" <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc:	"'Kristen Carlson Accardi'" <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"'Viresh Kumar'" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@...us.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] cpufreq, intel_pstate, set max_sysfs_pct and min_sysfs_pct on governor switch

On 2015.10.07 08:46 Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 10/07/2015 11:40 AM, Doug Smythies wrote:
>> 
>> Do we agree or disagree that the root issue seems to be (from your test)?:
>> 
>> \#  echo 100 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct
>> 
>> [   21.483436] store_min_perf_pct[453] min_sysfs_pct = 100
>> [   21.489373] store_min_perf_pct[456] min_perf_pct = 100
>> [   21.495203] store_min_perf_pct[459] min_perf_pct = 100
>> [   21.501050] store_min_perf_pct[462] min_perf_pct = 100
>
> Yep, and it appears to be done by default in Fedora & RHEL :/ ... the issue is
> still the same IMO that min_sysfs_pct & max_sysfs_pct are not cleared on a
> governor switch.

Clearing them will break some other things. For example, and as
shown in my original reply, resume from suspend.

Why? Because, at least on my computer, the governor is changed to
"performance" during suspend, and the "powersave" governor is
restored sometime during resume. The users wants the settings they had
before the suspend.

Continuing with that printk debug kernel from earlier:

pm-suspend:

[12599.912028] intel_pstate_set_policy[1001] min_perf_pct = 100
[12599.913781] intel_pstate_set_policy[1001] min_perf_pct = 100
[12599.915343] intel_pstate_set_policy[1001] min_perf_pct = 100
[12599.916877] intel_pstate_set_policy[1001] min_perf_pct = 100
[12599.918444] intel_pstate_set_policy[1001] min_perf_pct = 100
[12599.919686] intel_pstate_set_policy[1001] min_perf_pct = 100
[12599.920932] intel_pstate_set_policy[1001] min_perf_pct = 100
[12599.922191] intel_pstate_set_policy[1001] min_perf_pct = 100

Then push the power button, i.e. resume:

[12609.953358] intel_pstate_set_policy[1020] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.953360] intel_pstate_set_policy[1023] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.953361] intel_pstate_set_policy[1028] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.953796] intel_pstate_set_policy[1020] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.953797] intel_pstate_set_policy[1023] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.953798] intel_pstate_set_policy[1028] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.954209] intel_pstate_set_policy[1020] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.954210] intel_pstate_set_policy[1023] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.954211] intel_pstate_set_policy[1028] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.954619] intel_pstate_set_policy[1020] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.954620] intel_pstate_set_policy[1023] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.954621] intel_pstate_set_policy[1028] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.955028] intel_pstate_set_policy[1020] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.955029] intel_pstate_set_policy[1023] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.955030] intel_pstate_set_policy[1028] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.955431] intel_pstate_set_policy[1020] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.955432] intel_pstate_set_policy[1023] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.955433] intel_pstate_set_policy[1028] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.955833] intel_pstate_set_policy[1020] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.955834] intel_pstate_set_policy[1023] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.955835] intel_pstate_set_policy[1028] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.956234] intel_pstate_set_policy[1020] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.956235] intel_pstate_set_policy[1023] min_perf_pct = 50
[12609.956235] intel_pstate_set_policy[1028] min_perf_pct = 50

The below is copied from my original reply:

Before Patch, I get:

root@s15:/home/doug/temp# grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/*_perf_*
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct:80
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct:50
root@s15:/home/doug/temp# pm-suspend
...
root@s15:/home/doug/temp# grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/*_perf_*
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct:80
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct:50

After Patch, I get:

root@s15:/home/doug/temp# grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/*_perf_*
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct:80
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct:50
root@s15:/home/doug/temp# pm-suspend
...
root@s15:/home/doug/temp# grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/*_perf_*
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct:100
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct:42


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ