[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5615781D.4020506@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 13:53:01 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] (xen) for-jens-4.3 for your 'for-4.3/drivers' branch
On 10/07/2015 01:26 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Hey Jens,
>
> Please git pull an update branch to your 'for-4.3/drivers' branch (which
> oddly I don't see does not have the previous pull?)
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git stable/for-jens-4.3
>
> which has two fixes - one where we use the Xen blockfront EFI driver and
> don't release all the requests, the other if the allocation of resources
> for a particular state failed - we would go back 'Closing' and assume that
> an structure would be allocated while in fact it may not be - and crash.
>
> Please pull!
>
> P.S.
> The patches also have 'stable@...r.kernel.org' on them.
>
> drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> Cathy Avery (1):
> xen-blkfront: check for null drvdata in blkback_changed (XenbusStateClosing)
>
> Roger Pau Monne (1):
> xen/blkback: free requests on disconnection
There's only one commit in that pull request, the patch from Roger is
already in mainline from the last pull request. I think your mistake is
looking at for-4.3/drivers - this branch is defunct as soon as Linus has
pulled the initial bits for 4.3. After that, for-linus is the branch
that carries fixes for the _current_ branch.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists