[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151007225835-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 23:05:32 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com>,
Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@...udius-systems.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hjk@...sjkoch.de, corbet@....net,
bruce.richardson@...el.com, avi@...udius-systems.com,
gleb@...udius-systems.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
alexander.duyck@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] uio_pci_generic: add MSI/MSI-X support
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:31:04AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> It sounds like a separate vfio iommu backend from type1, one that just
> pins the page and returns the bus address. The curse and benefit would
> be that existing type1 users wouldn't "just work" in an insecure mode,
> the DMA mapping code would need to be aware of the difference. Still, I
> do really prefer to keep vfio as only exposing a secure, iommu protected
> device to the user because surely someone will try and users would
> expect that removing iommu restrictions from vfio means they can do
> device assignment to VMs w/o an iommu.
What I had in mind is rather reusing vfio code.
What is needed is all the logic for handling device reset, protecting
BARs and config space regions, MSI/MSI-X and device-specific
work-arounds.
Also, all the interface things such as eventfd.
But I don't think it should be the same char device as vfio -
/dev/vfio/vfio is world-accessible - should be a separate non-world
accessible device, maybe /dev/vfio/noiommu.
This will ensure e.g. qemu does not attempts to use it automatically.
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists