[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56157F49.5030101@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 22:23:37 +0200
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] SCSI: update hosts module to use idr index
management
On 10/06/2015 07:17 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 10:14 -0700, Lee Duncan wrote:
>> On 10/06/2015 02:40 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> struct Scsi_Host *scsi_host_lookup(unsigned short hostnum)
>>>> {
>>>> - struct device *cdev;
>>>> - struct Scsi_Host *shost = NULL;
>>>> -
>>>> - cdev = class_find_device(&shost_class, NULL, &hostnum,
>>>> - __scsi_host_match);
>>>> - if (cdev) {
>>>> - shost = scsi_host_get(class_to_shost(cdev));
>>>> - put_device(cdev);
>>>> - }
>>>> + struct Scsi_Host *shost;
>>>> +
>>>> + spin_lock(&host_index_lock);
>>>> + shost = idr_find(&host_index_idr, hostnum);
>>>> + spin_unlock(&host_index_lock);
>>>> +
>>>> return shost;
>>>
>>> How does this actually grab a reference to the host?
>>
>> Good catch -- I should have noticed that.
>>
>> I will resubmit the patch.
>
> I'll wait to see what you produce, but I don't think, using a separate
> idr array, you can close the race window between lookup and get. One of
> the nice things about using the cdev iterator is that the get is part of
> the lookup process.
>
Hmm. Should be possible if you free up the IDR in scsi_remove_host(),
just after setting the state to SHOST_DEL.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists