[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151008092827.GB6101@shlinux2>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 17:28:28 +0800
From: Robin Gong <b38343@...escale.com>
To: "Bondarenko, Anton" <Anton_Bondarenko@...tor.com>
CC: "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Wang, Jiada (ESD)" <Jiada_Wang@...tor.com>,
"Zapolskiy, Vladimir" <Vladimir_Zapolskiy@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] spi: imx: Add support for loopback for ECSPI
controllers
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 12:16:49AM +0000, Bondarenko, Anton wrote:
> On 30.09.2015 10:42, Robin Gong wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 07:57:12PM +0200, Anton Bondarenko wrote:
> >> @@ -370,8 +374,12 @@ static int __maybe_unused mx51_ecspi_config(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx,
> >> if (config->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)
> >> cfg |= MX51_ECSPI_CONFIG_SSBPOL(config->cs);
> >>
> >> + if (config->mode & SPI_LOOP)
> >> + lpb |= MX51_ECSPI_LOOP;
> >> +
> >> writel(ctrl, spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_CTRL);
> >> writel(cfg, spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_CONFIG);
> >> + writel(lpb, spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_TEST);
> > It's better write this MX51_ECSPI_TEST only in LOOP mode.
> LOOP mode can be set dynamically. This mean we should be able to set and clear the flag.
> Currently only LOOP flag is used. I did not find any problems with writing 0 in the rest
> fields of TEST register.
Yes, I know writing 0 is harmless, but we never need to touch this register if
SPI_LOOP flags not set, I'd like below:
if (config->mode & SPI_LOOP) {
lpb |= MX51_ECSPI_LOOP;
writel(lgb, spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_TEST);
}
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Wait until the changes in the configuration register CONFIGREG
> >> @@ -1276,12 +1287,13 @@ static int spi_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> spi_imx->bitbang.master->cleanup = spi_imx_cleanup;
> >> spi_imx->bitbang.master->prepare_message = spi_imx_prepare_message;
> >> spi_imx->bitbang.master->unprepare_message = spi_imx_unprepare_message;
> >> - spi_imx->bitbang.master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_CS_HIGH;
> >> + spi_imx->bitbang.master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA |
> >> + SPI_CS_HIGH;
> > Any change?
> Will be fixed in V3
> >>
> >> - init_completion(&spi_imx->xfer_done);
> >> + if (is_imx5x_ecspi(spi_imx))
> >> + spi_imx->bitbang.master->mode_bits |= SPI_LOOP;
> >>
> >> - spi_imx->devtype_data = of_id ? of_id->data :
> >> - (struct spi_imx_devtype_data *) pdev->id_entry->driver_data;
> >> + init_completion(&spi_imx->xfer_done);
> >>
> >> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> >> spi_imx->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> >> --
> >> 2.5.2
> >>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists