[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151008111000.GG17192@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:10:00 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, mark.rutland@....com,
Vladimir.Murzin@....com, steve.capper@...aro.org,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
will.deacon@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
edward.nevill@...aro.org, aph@...hat.com, james.morse@....com,
andre.przywara@....com, dave.martin@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/22] arm64: Cleanup HWCAP handling
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:02:03PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> +static bool cpus_have_hwcap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap)
> +{
> + switch(cap->hwcap_type) {
> + case CAP_HWCAP:
> + return !!(elf_hwcap & cap->hwcap);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> + case CAP_COMPAT_HWCAP:
> + return !!(compat_elf_hwcap & (u32)cap->hwcap);
> + case CAP_COMPAT_HWCAP2:
> + return !!(compat_elf_hwcap2 & (u32)cap->hwcap);
> +#endif
> + default:
> + BUG();
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
Apart from the multiple returns, you don't really need !! since the
return type is bool already.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists