[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151008111709.GE32532@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:17:09 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>, mark.rutland@....com,
Vladimir.Murzin@....com, steve.capper@...aro.org,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
andre.przywara@....com, will.deacon@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, edward.nevill@...aro.org,
aph@...hat.com, james.morse@....com, dave.martin@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/22] arm64: Cleanup HWCAP handling
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:10:00PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:02:03PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> > +static bool cpus_have_hwcap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap)
> > +{
> > + switch(cap->hwcap_type) {
> > + case CAP_HWCAP:
> > + return !!(elf_hwcap & cap->hwcap);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> > + case CAP_COMPAT_HWCAP:
> > + return !!(compat_elf_hwcap & (u32)cap->hwcap);
> > + case CAP_COMPAT_HWCAP2:
> > + return !!(compat_elf_hwcap2 & (u32)cap->hwcap);
> > +#endif
> > + default:
> > + BUG();
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +}
>
> Apart from the multiple returns, you don't really need !! since the
> return type is bool already.
That's wrong. a & b doesn't return 0 or 1, but the bitwise-and result.
http://yarchive.net/comp/linux/bool.html
especially hpa's response.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists