lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <BN3PR0301MB12193E5AE29F8FBCF0308D15F5350@BN3PR0301MB1219.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 02:01:47 +0000 From: Duan Andy <fugang.duan@...escale.com> To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@...adex.com>, "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org> CC: "stefan@...er.ch" <stefan@...er.ch>, "maitysanchayan@...il.com" <maitysanchayan@...il.com>, "knaack.h@....de" <knaack.h@....de>, "lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>, "pmeerw@...erw.net" <pmeerw@...erw.net>, "shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH] vf610_adc: Fix internal temperature calculation From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 11:53 PM > To: Bhuvanchandra DV; linux-iio@...r.kernel.org > Cc: stefan@...er.ch; maitysanchayan@...il.com; Duan Fugang-B38611; > knaack.h@....de; lars@...afoo.de; pmeerw@...erw.net; shawn.guo@...aro.org; > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Duan Fugang-B38611 > Subject: Re: [PATCH] vf610_adc: Fix internal temperature calculation > > On 23/09/15 14:43, Bhuvanchandra DV wrote: > > There is an observed temperature difference of ~20°C with the internal > > temperature reading and the temperature measured on SoC package. > > Existing calculations consider the typical values provided in > > datasheet. Those typical values are valid for VREFH_ADC at 3.0V. > > Voltage at 25°C is different for different VREFH_ADC voltages. With > > VREFH_ADC at 3.3V, voltage at 25°C is 0.699V. Hence update the VTEMP25 > > to 0.699V which gives ADCR@...p25 as 867 and the final temperature > > readings differs with ~5°C from the external readings. > > > > Formula for finding ADCR@...p25: > > ADCR@...p25 = (ADCR@Vdd * V@...P25 * 10) / VDDconv > > > > ADCR@Vdd for 12-Bit ADC = 4095 > > VDDconv = VREFH_ADC * 10 > > > > VREFH_ADC@...V > > ADCR@...p25 = (4095 * .699 * 10) / 33 > > ADCR@...p25 ~= 867 > > > > | VREFH_ADC | V@...P25 | VDDconv | ADCR@...p25 | > > | 3.0V | 0.696mV | 30 | 950 | > > | 3.3V | 0.699mV | 33 | 867 | > > > > Signed-off-by: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@...adex.com> > Looks fine to me, but I'll need an Ack from Fugang on this one as I don't > know or have the part I'm afraid. > > Jonathan The patch is fine for me. Sorry for the late response due to vacation. Acked-by: Fugang Duan <B38611@...escale.com> > > --- > > drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c | 19 ++++++++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c > > index f4df2a7..e7abc13 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c > > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c > > @@ -103,6 +103,13 @@ > > > > #define DEFAULT_SAMPLE_TIME 1000 > > > > +/* V at 25°C of 696 mV */ > > +#define VF610_VTEMP25_3V0 950 > > +/* V at 25°C of 699 mV */ > > +#define VF610_VTEMP25_3V3 867 > > +/* Typical sensor slope coefficient at all temperatures */ > > +#define VF610_TEMP_SLOPE_COEFF 1840 > > + > > enum clk_sel { > > VF610_ADCIOC_BUSCLK_SET, > > VF610_ADCIOC_ALTCLK_SET, > > @@ -636,11 +643,13 @@ static int vf610_read_raw(struct iio_dev > *indio_dev, > > break; > > case IIO_TEMP: > > /* > > - * Calculate in degree Celsius times 1000 > > - * Using sensor slope of 1.84 mV/°C and > > - * V at 25°C of 696 mV > > - */ > > - *val = 25000 - ((int)info->value - 864) * 1000000 / > 1840; > > + * Calculate in degree Celsius times 1000 > > + * Using the typical sensor slope of 1.84 mV/°C > > + * and VREFH_ADC at 3.3V, V at 25°C of 699 mV > > + */ > > + *val = 25000 - ((int)info->value - VF610_VTEMP25_3V3) * > > + 1000000 / VF610_TEMP_SLOPE_COEFF; > > + > > break; > > default: > > mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock); > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists