[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1510081424210.27742@localhost.lm.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 14:29:48 +0000 (UTC)
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
cc: Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] block: nvme-core: simplify ida usage
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com> writes:
>> Simplify ida index allocation and removal by
>> using the ida_simple_* helper functions.
Looks good to me. Just one comment:
>> static void nvme_release_instance(struct nvme_dev *dev)
>> {
>> spin_lock(&dev_list_lock);
>> - ida_remove(&nvme_instance_ida, dev->instance);
>> + ida_simple_remove(&nvme_instance_ida, dev->instance);
>> spin_unlock(&dev_list_lock);
No harm from taking the nvme spin lock here, but it's not necessary with
the simple interface.
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists