[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANq1E4TCiCJPFiUtTvX_Y7VDOMf=9hLE8HGeRNFOoX0yVT7LkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 16:34:27 +0200
From: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
To: Sergei Zviagintsev <sergei@...v.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...glemail.com>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/44] kdbus: Cleanup kdbus_conn_unicast()
Hi
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Sergei Zviagintsev <sergei@...v.net> wrote:
> Do not initialize `name' and `ret' as values are assigned to them at
> the first use by kdbus_pin_dst(). Simplify handling of
> kdbus_conn_entry_insert() return value and drop useless goto.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Zviagintsev <sergei@...v.net>
> ---
> ipc/kdbus/connection.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ipc/kdbus/connection.c b/ipc/kdbus/connection.c
> index db49f282a1bf..b3c5f20a57d8 100644
> --- a/ipc/kdbus/connection.c
> +++ b/ipc/kdbus/connection.c
> @@ -1229,12 +1229,12 @@ static int kdbus_conn_unicast(struct kdbus_conn *src,
> struct kdbus_staging *staging)
> {
> const struct kdbus_msg *msg = staging->msg;
> - struct kdbus_name_entry *name = NULL;
> + struct kdbus_name_entry *name;
> struct kdbus_reply *wait = NULL;
> struct kdbus_conn *dst = NULL;
> struct kdbus_bus *bus = src->ep->bus;
> bool is_signal = (msg->flags & KDBUS_MSG_SIGNAL);
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ret;
>
> if (WARN_ON(msg->dst_id == KDBUS_DST_ID_BROADCAST) ||
> WARN_ON(!(msg->flags & KDBUS_MSG_EXPECT_REPLY) &&
> @@ -1245,7 +1245,6 @@ static int kdbus_conn_unicast(struct kdbus_conn *src,
> down_read(&bus->name_registry->rwlock);
>
> /* find and pin destination */
> -
If a comment is addressed to a whole following block, we usually put a
newline after it. Only if the comment is only addressed at the next
code-line, we don't.
> ret = kdbus_pin_dst(bus, staging, &name, &dst);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto exit;
> @@ -1276,11 +1275,10 @@ static int kdbus_conn_unicast(struct kdbus_conn *src,
> kdbus_bus_eavesdrop(bus, src, staging);
>
> ret = kdbus_conn_entry_insert(src, dst, staging, wait, name);
> - if (ret < 0 && !is_signal)
> - goto exit;
>
> /* signals are treated like broadcasts, recv-errors are ignored */
> - ret = 0;
> + if (is_signal)
> + ret = 0;
Why? Just to reduce the line-count? You break the code-flow here, by
making the success-path conditional, instead of the error-path.
Thanks
David
>
> exit:
> up_read(&bus->name_registry->rwlock);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists